Published 2 years after Casson discovered Henry Neville’s library of numerous books long known to have been sources for the Shakespeare canon (and many annotated). I presume this forms a major part of the book? I’ve not read it yet.
Finally reading Shakespeare's Library (2018) by @StuartKells.
Informative and enjoyable.
Spoiler alert: written before @FeinsteinKen's discoveries.
Curious what Kells knows/thinks about them.
-
-
-
Very very little information on Audley End or the annotations in the books. The book is so incredibly bad.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks Marc. Much appreciated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kells does not even have the most basic understanding of any of the issues involved. This is the most misinformed thing I have ever seen in any book on Shakespeare. No one, Stratfordian or anti-Stratfordian, can take him seriously.pic.twitter.com/b34feJGcvi
-
He is an expert on Shakespeare, has been studying him for more than 20 years. And he is an expert on antique books and libraries as well. Probably your extravagant theories collapsed with reality and that’s why you don’t want to take him seriously
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.