You have to dispassionately and logically exclude coincidence. See what else It yields. All I see are cherry picked hits. A systematic study would be necessary.
I know it's a stretch, but when simply placing letters in a rectangular frame -- no anagrams or code book required -- yields cross-words like "Henry," "Neuille," "rimer," "Nashe," "Blunt," "Monti," "Brute," and "no one" it doesn't seem unreasonable to hypothesize intention.https://twitter.com/FeinsteinKen/status/1205241096860602368 …
-
-
-
That is why my Shakespeare affinity test is so amazing. The criteria are simple and it runs on a database I didn't create.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.