Actually, I think these discussions are interesting, but I do not know enough about the antecedent scholarship to really follow the arguments.
Good questions. To which at least some post-Stratfordians have quite good answers. Hard to reckon in the little room on Twitter, though, and most of my followers are utterly uninterested in this, so I will leave the rest to silence for now.https://twitter.com/RobertMPayne1/status/1202628140360585216 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've read a number of anti-Strat arguments & none has produced any hard evidence of this effort to hide the claimant & front Stratford. They all rest on literary interpretation & cryptography, despite anti-Strat claims to the contrary. OTOH, there's a prima-facie case for WS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.