Oxford was dead before many of the plays were written, so in that regard Neville being alive gives him a step up. There are no surviving plays attributed to either of them There's no evidence Neville was a poet, while Oxford wrote court poetry in his 20s. 1/2
Looking forward to your evidence. Encouraged to see that "it has to be admitted that Neville is a much better fit than Oxford."https://twitter.com/Oxfraud/status/1202600862385934336 …
-
-
-
There's a lot of information on our site (http://Oxfraud.com ), and disqus commenting if you have questions or want to discuss. 2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
They are Hand D magicians turning these signatures into apologetic gold.pic.twitter.com/dzeWon5WSx
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here's a passage from a book review detailing the unlikelihood of the plot needed to hide the purported true author & front the Stratford man.Such a plot would've been almost impossible, so probably didn't happen &
#WillWasWill.What's said of Oxford also applies to any claimant:pic.twitter.com/0w6BZ1vUC3
-
If 1% of this myth were true, the 99% would follow. Strats ASSUME the plays were written for the KM ~1600. No sound basis for that. Oxies say they were for the court 1565-85. Later KM actors just got old scripts, didn't question & rarely put them on for the public.
#willwaswill - 19 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.