On the contrary, if they were never FAIRLY categorized as practicing law, but were UNFAIRLY characterized as practicing law for the purpose of avoiding UPL liability, and are now defined as NOT practicing law, that seems like progress to me.
It doesn't seem like progress for authorities to carve out a UPL exception for things that were never fairly characterized as the practice of law in the first place.https://twitter.com/AndrewArruda/status/1141409541487075328 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.