Value props can be very clear, but amassing the willpower to seize them is the bigger barrier. Normalcy bias and hierarchy are ingrained in legal profession. Also, one must pinpoint "critical contracts," a skill that comes from experience.
Being able to interact with contracts not just as digital objects, but as code-like structures of permissions & obligations, could bring a new degree of transparency, verifiability, and playing-field-leveling. Not clear how clear those value propositions are, though.https://twitter.com/DigitalLawyer/status/1131333843259015170 …
-
-
-
The most obvious and on the face, simplest, is a discharge statement regarding the payment of money. "Money cleared in account - yes" "here is statement discharging legal interest". etc.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think forcing every peg into a deontic-shaped hole makes the benefits of the tools less clear. See e.g.
@Data61news Regulation as a Platform project, where nearly every encoded rule starts with "it is obligatory that..." Deontics are better as predicates, not modes.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
First articulate the pain points for the target audiences--from there build the value proposition. What would contract as code make easier, fairer? For what groups? I'm sure there are good gains but they need to be simply articulated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.