1. Current grunt work is of questionable pedagogical value. 2. I have never learned more about an area of law than when trying to systematize that knowledge in an expert system. 3. Law changes, so must the expert systems. Juniors will update the expert systems, learn even more.
An important question that goes back to the earliest days of legal expert systems. We have to focus on ways of learning that don't require apprenticeship in grunt work.https://twitter.com/matthomann/status/1087201125504303104 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
how do chemist do it? Lab time. How do biologist do it? Lab time. Sometimes, even when you have a PhD--you need to put in the time so you can truly understand how things/equipment/calibration, etc work. Good mathematicians always carry pencils and grid pads.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But to be an ‘expert’ requires experience whether through grunt work or not. There must, surely, be a beginning somewhere.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Learning to build in QnAMarkup and NeotaLogic was not intuitive for me, so it very much felt like grunt work for the months it took to really grok them. I wouldn't have gotten it without paying in early. Learning can be really hard, and that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.