Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
Which Mac is the best for product design? It depends. Here’s some extremely non-scientific tests using popular design tools, where I drew a bunch of boxes with strokes and rotated them.pic.twitter.com/kR4wNDppfL
How many boxes? As many as was required to make the tool get very stressed. It was a different number of elements for each tool, so this isn’t a like for like comparison. It’s more about resource usage and what’s important when speccing a Mac for design work.
Why boxes with strokes? Why rotating? It will alter the object data and cause a repaint of all objects. I also wanted to focus on a common operation. The results will vary pretty wildly in a tool like Photoshop, depending on what you’re doing.
Worth noting that for this test, lower usage is bad news, not good news. I pushed them all until the canvas was very laggy. All going well, the app should be pegging the CPU or GPU, making the best use of available resources.
Oops. Affinity Designer was set to use OpenGL. Here’s the tests again, with Metal added for AD. Better use of CPU, but identical advice.pic.twitter.com/vWnrjJ3t7W
I’ve been working on some tests to see which design tools perform the best. The tests are not perfect, but I think they still provide good insights.pic.twitter.com/70iH8oswz7
Here’s the results for 16,384 roundrects being rotated. The action is done a few times and averaged.pic.twitter.com/qjgkC5dwgn
Surprisingly, I think the best overall winner for these tests is Affinity Designer, using OpenGL (not Metal!). More tests coming at some point soon.
Oh, and here’s the file sizes for the test docs. (Things are set up as empty as possible, with all the extra Ai junk removed.)pic.twitter.com/ucM3iEOZx8
Apologies for the messed up x axis labels. The rest of the charts should be good.
Time for some more design tool test results. How long does it take to open the test documents I’ve been using? Photoshop? 
pic.twitter.com/BWeemtuCHo
Is one design tool faster than the others, for everything? No. Definitely not. Here’s how long it takes to fit to window, after being zoomed in (triggering a full canvas repaint).pic.twitter.com/lbhtwHAhv7
It’s time for some more design tool test results. These tests boolean intersect two stars with varying numbers of points (125, 250, 500, and 1000).pic.twitter.com/q6uCv8bavZ
Affinity Designer was the best overall. Photoshop clearly won the 1000 point test. Sketch didn’t fare so well — slowest all round, couldn’t complete the 500 and 1000 point stars, and broken results for the tests it could complete. Figma’s results were also broken.pic.twitter.com/etqfVPoNF3
Are there any design tool tests you’d like to see? I’m working on some now that focus on symbols.
Sketch 57 definitely improved boolean ops. Good to see improvements there. I’ll re-run the tests and post results today, if I get a chance.
Sketch 57 drastically improves vector boolean support. I re-ran my tests, and while it’s not the quickest, it is very respectable. Far faster than previous versions.pic.twitter.com/Pj1dghDEkE
More importantly, it not as easy to break. Sketch 56 was easy to trip up, but 57 is as good as other tools. Figma still has work to do.pic.twitter.com/Ad0NXdnGXF
These boolean tests are pretty simple. There are lots of intersections, but they are just straight lines. I’ll have to build some tests that push things a bit further.
Most of the tests are measured by recording a portion of the screen at 60fps (recording the full screen would impact perf more). The videos are then inspected to work out the start and end frame of each action.pic.twitter.com/Ykm3AYlfFg
Each one of these videos contains multiple takes. It’s a labour intensive process, but it’s nice to have reasonably objective stats for these things.pic.twitter.com/k7te7fm9KD
It seems wild that this needs to be tested, but some welcome and new document windows take a while to open. Affinity Designer loads content via the network on first launch.pic.twitter.com/KutOhSLrlh
Affinity Designer’s window can be interacted with quickly, but it’s still jarring to have content appear after a few seconds. Figma isn’t shown, because it doesn’t really have a welcome or new document view.
Here’s how those welcome and new document windows fit on 13-inch MacBook Airs and MacBook Pros (Apple’s most popular Macs). Note that XD’s window doesn’t fit. HOW DID THAT SHIP?!pic.twitter.com/LFrgO2YxZQ
Yet another design tool test: If lots of images are added to a document, how does that affect overall file size?pic.twitter.com/SBRv7wAbUM
The PNG images were all generated in Processing, to ensure they’re unique. Figma and XD only had a tiny overhead on the combined size of the PNGs. Both seem to store the images in their original form.pic.twitter.com/7v0RzIY1XP
Most of the tools fairly happily added the 1000 images. The quickest method I could use in Photoshop required me to press enter 1000 times though.pic.twitter.com/Yu4mJTJeU4
Self intersecting bézier paths are a good test of design tools. In this example, a single segment loops back through itself. Four loops make up the full shape. Note that Illustrator doesn’t draw it perfectly.pic.twitter.com/zw8B8bF292
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
