Wait so like, did stallman do something? Stallman is RMS, right? I keep seeing people talking about him what he do.
-
They already bypassed consensus by censoring the manual without discussion though. It looks to me like the patch has been reverted pending the consensus seeking that should have happened first.
The problem isn't the meta-discussion about the process that was followed and whether it followed policy, the problem is Stallman dropping nuggest like this: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-05/msg00084.html … or this: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-05/msg00149.html … .
-
-
I don't know. How would you feel about these "nuggets" if they were in response to people trying to sneak through a change to the GPL that removed the requirement to provide source?
-
Isn't that basically what the GCC vs LLVM thing is? Political disagreements over whose freedom should be protected?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.