Please point out a network protocol that requires "layers" to scale up. Last I checked SMTP, HTTP, XMPP, etc. have no problem scaling linearly with user count without requiring new "layered" protocols on top to fix underlying design flaws. We added a layer (TLS) for security.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Arlos_Guitar
Yes, they're are layers, but they aren't a patch for scalability. They each serve a specific function. We add new layers to add features and reach the complete product, not to fix scalability problems in the underlying layers.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @Arlos_Guitar
And of course increasing the block size doesn't work either. You need a new protocol with a fundamentally scalable design.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Arlos_Guitar
Indeed. My argument is merely that the core Bitcoin protocol (and network) are too broken to be worth building upon. The real solution is a completely new design.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Arlos_Guitar
Bitcoin doesn't even work as a store of value, at scale, with how broken it is. We're better off with something else. Yes Lightning will help to a point, but it will never scale to truly global scale if it's built on vanilla Bitcoin.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
BCH is a pragmatic short-term patch that does nothing to fix the real problem. I don't have a opinion on PoS. I don't have a favorite "this will solve all of our problems" altcoin yet. I just know we need one.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.