Bitcoin consumes 4,000,000,000 W of power to process four transactions per second. A single Raspberry Pi with a database can do an order of magnitude more on 5W. Think about that next time you wonder if it's a good design.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @marcan42
How much power do you think our entire global banking system consumes, conversions of hours and miles and so forth taken into consideration? Yes, as a species we spend enormous energy on transactions. Quantification is great, but doesn't change our nature.
5 replies 4 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @dreamandghost
At current Bitcoin energy-guzzling levels, transactions cost $33 worth of electricity with normal electricity pricing (as banks would get). Which they obviously don't with traditional banking. Therefore traditional banking is more efficient than Bitcoin.
5 replies 5 retweets 57 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @dreamandghost
I heard they can still scale up block size, would that not help in the long run? And why not stop bitcoin and instead of branching just replace it with a scalable program and replace everyone’s funds according to the last ledger? Why is this such a problem not fixable?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Scaling up the block size won't fix the underlying problem, because it only works to a small extent. You can't make blocks 1TB big and require everyone keep them all stored. Yes, you could fork into a different (better) design, but that's not Bitcoin any more.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.