Bitcoin consumes 4,000,000,000 W of power to process four transactions per second. A single Raspberry Pi with a database can do an order of magnitude more on 5W. Think about that next time you wonder if it's a good design.
-
-
References or it didn't happen :) A few of the currencies don't use mining, or use it in a much more limited fashion. Those could be better options.
-
I know math is hard, but you can try it too, it doesn't hurt ;)pic.twitter.com/S4qgDXR1Ia
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow that's bull... It's amazing how wrong a person can be. But thanks for illustrating.
-
Feel free to actually do the math and show me exactly how I'm wrong.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Nazi's were pretty efficient. Efficiency isn't the goal.
-
If the Nazis we're *a billion times more efficient* at something then, you know, it'd be worth figuring out what they did to achieve that, because, you know, being evil doesn't explain nine orders of magnitude.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I heard they can still scale up block size, would that not help in the long run? And why not stop bitcoin and instead of branching just replace it with a scalable program and replace everyone’s funds according to the last ledger? Why is this such a problem not fixable?
-
Scaling up the block size won't fix the underlying problem, because it only works to a small extent. You can't make blocks 1TB big and require everyone keep them all stored. Yes, you could fork into a different (better) design, but that's not Bitcoin any more.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.