Your language may be "safe" and you may pass test vectors but reimplementing crypto is *still* a bad idea.https://twitter.com/daniel_bilar/status/946034680062730240 …
-
-
-
Replying to @perrymetzger @marcan42
curious how you mean – I assume more than memory safety?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For one thing, memory safety guarantees in concurrent Go programs are rather poor.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @perrymetzger @tehgeekmeister
I did put "safe" in quotes for a reason ;)
1:47 PM - 29 Dec 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.