Last year they made me take down my interlocked RGB projector which was located at well above eye level and pointed at a wall, so I definitely won't be bringing it this year.
-
-
Replying to @marcan42 @datenwolf
That is no point, CERT would have been involved. Only if fire safety is directly concerned, we get in contact with you. I don't know whoever let you take it down and why.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @c3cert @datenwolf
Some angel asked for official German legal paperwork regarding the laser, which I obviously didn't have, and said I needed to take it down if I didn't have it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @datenwolf
That has not been a CERTling. "some angel"s behaviour I cant't explain or justify. Maybe you want to talk to PL / Orga.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @c3cert @datenwolf
Seems the person who requested the takedown was HonkHase.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If HonkHase says it's a problem, it's probably a problem. The guys it usually pretty chill and only takes out the ban-hammer if it could really create some trouble (which includes legal). But: You don't mess with HonkHase.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @datenwolf @c3cert
It wasn't a problem every year prior, then suddenly all lasers disappeared on day 1 of 33c3. Whatever the problem was, it had nothing to do with individual lasers and everything to do with some kind of general decision, legal or otherwise.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Huh, actually on the 33c3 in the upper levels of the CCH there were a few high powered lasers, with a static beam configuration, also leaving the premises, which made me kind of nervous. If you can see a red laser beam without fog it's certainly beyond class-3a
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @datenwolf @c3cert
Laser classes are useless. The danger posed by a laser is way more complicated than what class it is. Any useful scanner is going to be Class 4 (mine is), but there's a huge difference between a laser pointer (static beam) and a scanner at a minimum distance.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Here's the thing: In the research we do at our group, we deliberately deliver a focused laser beam into a subjects eye (usually ourself), to create volumetric images. We are using scanning spots, but we don't take that as a reason to go over class 2a; we keep it safe for static.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Well duh. Class 2a is already ridiculously bright when aimed into an eye directly. If you're focusing all the energy directly into someone's pupil, of course you don't need to go to dangerous energy levels. There is an enormous loss in diffuse scattering that you bypass.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.