Sigh, I need to remember to never read the YouTube comments on @Techmoan videos. There is *always* a huge misguided discussion about analog vs. digital that raises my blood pressure. Your argument is invalid unless you have ABX tests to back it. Hint: digital does.
Read https://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html … (grep for 120dB if you must). In practice, 16 bits is more than enough for any practical situation.
-
-
Interesting, I'll give it a good read when I get some time, thanks!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Had a look to the video, and it cheats a bit :). It does increase SNR *only* on a reduced zone of the spectrum (and increases it in other zones). Thus it is effectively reducing overall noise when using e.g. A frequency weighting (to assimilate to human hearing).
-
But it is not correct (or at least not complete) just to say "it increases SNR beyond 96 dB". It only does it on a fraction of the spectrum (the fraction interesting to human hearing).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.