Sigh, I need to remember to never read the YouTube comments on @Techmoan videos. There is *always* a huge misguided discussion about analog vs. digital that raises my blood pressure. Your argument is invalid unless you have ABX tests to back it. Hint: digital does.
-
Show this thread
-
Analog is great and fun and fascinating and good analog can sound great but. Stop. Claiming. It's. Fundamentally. Better. Than. Digital. It just isn't. Ever. CDs can reproduce the entirety of the human hearing range under all practical conditions. Full stop.
7 replies 8 retweets 28 likesShow this thread -
If you the words "infinite sample rates" or "time resolution" or "16 bits of dynamic range" or "24bit/192k" are now popping into your head as counterarguments, you need to watch this video and try again: https://xiph.org/video/vid2.shtml …
4 replies 3 retweets 31 likesShow this thread -
This is for audio Marcan but for video there is a totally different story. Even analog film reels from the sixties are now rescanned to new 4K masters. The resolution is very high.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yes, sorry, I didn't specify. I'm talking about audio. We have reached resolution transparency for video (smartphone screen densities) but there are a lot more problems to overcome (e.g. dynamic range) and consumer technology isn't there yet for movies.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
That said, within the realm of cinema projection, 4K and 35mm film are pretty close. Digital isn't transparent yet, but it's mostly caught up to analog quality. We've reached the point where 35mm doesn't make sense either.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Of course if you go into IMAX territory that's a different story.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.