I love it when a developer closes a bug with a fix that is completely ineffective due to a different bug. Makes it obvious they didn't actually test anything.
Show this thread
Am I the only one who thinks it's downright rude to close a bug with a fix you didn't test? If you can't be arsed to test it, at least leave the bug open until the reporter confirms it's fixed.
-
-
Who has time to test when there are so many bugs to create?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On a side note, that's a reason why it's useful to distinguish "fixed" (responsibility of the dev) and "closed" (responsibility of the reporter) in a bug tracker.
-
"fix attempted (N times)"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is why bug bounties are needed everywhere. New bug? New cost. More incentive to improve hiring and firing practices..
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At work we close a lot of bugs when we kick off automation that should fix them. Of course automation will reopen them if the problem persists. We also have a verified status for the reporter to set.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.