Let me know why anybody should implement a mitigation for something that is having little to no impact on data, users nor the company.
-
-
Replying to @klon
So you're saying it's okay to let users *permanently* make posts *against* the rules, thus polluting the DB with inconsistent data?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Seriously, I hope I never have to fix a system you designed or audited :p
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
You could have fitted that in a 280 character tweet, yet you didn't. Why?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But hey let's now analyze what you are saying...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Which rule? Where on the agreements you accepted as a user of twitter did you agree that your publications will be 140 chars long?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @klon
Dude, you still don't get it. The new length rule is 240 chars and CJK count double. The latter check is JS only.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That means a priori they have a bug that people in the staged test can abuse to post noncompliant tweets.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But since they *also* neglected to properly lock down the test, now *anyone* can compose noncompliant tweets.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That means right now *anyone* can post tweets with 240 CJK characters that we're *never* intended to be possible, for *anyone*, *ever*.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
And I meant 280 but I'm trying to get this done quickly without annoying my family :p
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.