But what if the server only accepts tweets <=280 characters??
-
-
The problem is it accepts tweets with 280 Japanese characters. Which is not supposed to happen.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Which is bullshit tbh. Either make it available for all characters or none. That would be like excluding Ys.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Exactly. If Unicode contained ligatures for each possible pair of Cyrillic characters, would it be fair to count each as just one?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Æ œ ᵫ ß also count as a one character, despite being ligatures of ae, oe, ue, ſs/ſʒ. It is called character limit, not letter for a reason.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But no Western language is written *entirely* in ligatures like that. There's a reason why Unicode has a notion of double-width characters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Heck, in Japanese text terminals Kanji and standard kana take twice the screen space as ASCII characters. In SJIS ASCII is 1 byte, kanji 2.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The Unicode notion of a "character" is not a good measure of screen real estate nor of information content. It shouldn't be used as such.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I still think it is stupid to intentionally exclude their characters. Make it globally, keep it at 140 or limit their space to 70 instead.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What's the difference between limiting CJK to 70 and doubling everything else to 280? The ratio remains the same.
-
-
People would have less space to type shit and thus are limited to limit themselves, just like they are now.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Except CJK users are already *not* limited. Making things worse for them is worse than making things better for everyone else.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.