I finally found a reason to use IPv6 NAT/masquerading and this feels so wrong. Trying to route my home net into a walled garden /64 subnet.
-
eg., allocate a /64 out of the /56 and then setup routing and dhcp/slaac accordingly, using some scripts to adapt to changes in dhcp leases
I still have the issue that I only get a /64 to participate in the walled garden. There's no way around doing address translation.
-
-
Maybe using router advertisements for my main network and sub-/64 allocation via DHCPv6 for the walled garden, but that's even messier.
-
I want my end hosts to not have to change. They get a simple single routable v6 address and can just transparently NAT to the walled garden.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.