I finally found a reason to use IPv6 NAT/masquerading and this feels so wrong. Trying to route my home net into a walled garden /64 subnet.
-
Some ISP provides subnet delegation of around /60 size via dhcpv6, and openwrt provides an automatic setup by default.
This isn't an ISP service, but a walled garden. DHCPv6 only hands out split DNS, no prefixes. My real ISP gives me a /56 of course.
-
-
What I'm trying to do is NAT my subnets (which are from my real /56) into the walled garden prefixes so they can access it and the Internet.
-
In this case, I think avoiding NAT is still possible but might be harder to configure than the NAT approach.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.