-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @flameeyes @PWTooStrong
Last thing I built took 6-512 characters, from printable ASCII [0x20..0x7e]. Why can't everything just do something like that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @PWTooStrong
I still wish we had a way to at least describe password policies if they have to be this complicated :(
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flameeyes @PWTooStrong
This seems to be Google's take on meaning ASCII without saying ASCII, which is... not terrible.pic.twitter.com/dpQKXxWLcI
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @PWTooStrong
Then you have the systems that will take "common punctuation", but not &.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flameeyes @PWTooStrong
Those systems are obviously broken and should be fixed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @PWTooStrong
I would argue that 3 IE can only be fixed by firing their whole IT department.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flameeyes @PWTooStrong
Interestignly, trying Google's strength indicator... "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" is "strong" until the last 's', then "good".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But apparently the word "particle" is uncommon enough to be "strong". "gigabyte" is weak, but "terabyte" is strong. "megabyte" is in between
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And "kilobyte" is strong?!?
-
-
Also "uncommon" is apparently uncommon enough to be strong. Honestly I'm not sure I agree with any <10 letter dict word being "strong"...
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.