Are you doing double NAT by choice? If so, why? I'm curious.
Routing doesn't work on the inbound connections. I'd still need to NAT those.
-
-
And once I'm doing that in the Netgear it means putting a bunch of per-service firewall rules in there I'd much rather keep in the x86 box.
-
Basically you're proposing moving more duties/complexity back to the Netgear for the sake of avoiding a double NAT... why?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
??? You'd DNAT to the IP in the network behind the Linux box.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.