Had they picked that for their shitty CGNAT, it wouldn't be able to hit my server (result: their customers can't access, everyone else can!)
-
I mean, my only other option was to stick a PPPoE client in my initramfs. Keeping all routing duties on the Netgear wasn't an option (perf).
There's no real downside to the double-NAT here, since all protocols are forwarded. And some minor upsides (e.g. insulation from IP changes)
-
-
I'm not sure I understand, much less agree. Please elaborate on the upsides.
-
I can have a static network configuration in the main router host, with no dynamic reconfig, since the dyn IP is NATed to a static address.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.