Apparently they're using RFC1918 space for CgNAT (which is stupid, they should use RFC6598) and it leaks into their colo servers sans NAT.
The reason is remote unlock, so I don't have to stick a PPPoE client in my initramfs. Also I have remote access to a serial console via SSH.
-
-
Actually I run two PPPoE sessions, and only one (v4) terminates in the Netgear. The other passes through (no NAT or extra routing hop on v6)
-
Okay. I don't think I would have chosen that. To each his own. You have logical reasons, so no complaint here.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.