Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
marcan42's profile
Hector Martin
Hector Martin
Hector Martin
@marcan42

Tweets

Hector Martin

@marcan42

If it ain't broke, I'll fix it! I'm porting Linux to Apple Silicon Macs at @AsahiLinux. http://patreon.com/marcan  | http://github.com/sponsors/marcan 

Tokyo, Japan
marcan.st
Joined May 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 22 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      I just came back from full blown forensics mode. Conclusion: everything OK, this was just caused by multiple levels of (third party) stupid.pic.twitter.com/C2kjhAs2I4

      1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes
    2. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 22 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @marcan42

      Yes, that's an RFC1918 IP (not in a range I use (!)) logging in to a server as root, with password. And there was no wtmp entry or history.

      2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
    3. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 22 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @marcan42

      Conclusion: the people nominally managing this server (who still use passwords) SFTPed in from the *same* ISP and they fail at CgNAT.

      2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
    4. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 22 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @marcan42

      Apparently they're using RFC1918 space for CgNAT (which is stupid, they should use RFC6598) and it leaks into their colo servers sans NAT.

      1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes
    5. Grant Taylor‏ @DrScriptt 22 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @marcan42

      Remember that all IPv4 address space is routable. RFC 1918 is usually not routed. (127/8 is debatable.)

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    6. Grant Taylor‏ @DrScriptt 22 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @DrScriptt @marcan42

      I’d argue for bogon filters on internet interface to ISP’s CGNAT space.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 23 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @DrScriptt

      Thing is RFC1918 is usually reserved for end-user usage. I happen to have a dangerously close 172.17.0.0/16 net on this server internally.

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 23 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @marcan42 @DrScriptt

      Had they picked that for their shitty CGNAT, it wouldn't be able to hit my server (result: their customers can't access, everyone else can!)

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Grant Taylor‏ @DrScriptt 23 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @marcan42

      That's where double NATing comes into play. *SHUDDER*

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. Grant Taylor‏ @DrScriptt 23 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @DrScriptt @marcan42

      Double NATing has it's uses. Using it to avoid IP conflicts like this is not fun in any way shape or form.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 23 Jun 2017
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @DrScriptt

      I actually double NAT for my home internet. But the first layer is 1:1, even pings get NATed. Except one TCP port.

      9:07 AM - 23 Jun 2017
      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 23 Jun 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @marcan42 @DrScriptt

          But yeah, I'm sure some combination of hacks could've made that mess work but... not fun. Maybe playing with netns and two layers of nginx.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Grant Taylor‏ @DrScriptt 23 Jun 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @marcan42

          Ya, I've done it before. Traditionally it's done with multiple routes. Network namespaces would make it easier.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Grant Taylor‏ @DrScriptt 23 Jun 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @marcan42

          Are you doing double NAT by choice? If so, why? I'm curious.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Hector Martin‏ @marcan42 23 Jun 2017
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @DrScriptt

          I moved most of my routing duties to an x86 box, but I still terminate the PPPoE connection in my OpenWRT Netgear.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info