Use faac?
In other news, the ffmpeg AAC encoder is *still* a complete disgrace, and you're better off using LAME at 96kbps than ffmpeg-aac at 128kbps.
-
-
-
Even worse Apple's AAC encoder is really the only worthwhile one, though libfdk_aac is somewhat serviceable
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It's funny because it was completely rewritten to be better Makes you wonder how bad it was to begin with
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://mrcn.st/t/fftest128.m4a.artifacts.flac … https://mrcn.st/t/fftest128.mp3.artifacts.flac … https://mrcn.st/t/fftest128fdk.m4a.artifacts.flac … Convinced AAC < LAME < FDK-AAC yet? (artifacts +15dB)
-
Look, I'm not judging you, writing encoders is hard, but the ffmpeg site proudly claims "better than fdk" and... not even close.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Dude, if they were inaudible I wouldn't have noticed in the first place. I just ABXed myself with two other piano tracks and 20/20.
-
Haven't found a non-piano sample yet. But at this point I'm confident ffmpeg-aac has, at least, a general problem encoding piano.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
FLAC ftw
-
The only reason I'd use AAC is for compatibility with stupid stuff that only takes AAC. Like Twitter.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.