That's not my concerns. I still think LF/CII should buy me PaX/Grsec's test patch. Spender/PaX team treated us well in past 16 yrs until..
-
-
It makes no sense to blame other people for Spender's decision to stop sharing. That decision is his and his alone.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
it make sense to me and some other ppl. We made our point very clear: https://hardenedlinux.github.io/announcement/2017/04/29/hardenedlinux-statement2.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
I read that article. The whole "upstream/KSPP takes and gives nothing back" narrative is complete nonsense.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
grsecurity takes... the entire rest of the kernel from upstream. Guess what's more important, the grsec patch, or everything else?
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
The whole point of the GPLv2 is that we all benefit from everyone's work. grsecurity stopped sharing, so now we have to use what they left.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Obviously it will take time to improve upstream sec to the point where grsecurity is today... but once it's done the benefits are obvious.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Yes, grsec innovated and did so first. That doesn't mean they get a free pass to shit on everyone else and blame them for pulling the plug.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
IMOHO, spender never shit on anyone. He is simply telling the truth. I don't care anyone else's personal character but the solution itself.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
PaX/Grsec can solve my problem and that's it. KSPP could be better w/o LF/CII's improper marketing PR getting involved.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So petition spender for access to PaX/Grsec. Stop blaming others for a decision they didn't take.
12:51 AM - 5 Jun 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.