Ok, it seems reasonable to me. I'm sick of what KSPP/Linux foundation has been doing.
-
-
Some of us are sick of what grsec/spender has been doing... spender apparently bans people just for saying hi on the KSPP mailing list.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
That's not my concerns. I still think LF/CII should buy me PaX/Grsec's test patch. Spender/PaX team treated us well in past 16 yrs until..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It makes no sense to blame other people for Spender's decision to stop sharing. That decision is his and his alone.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
it make sense to me and some other ppl. We made our point very clear: https://hardenedlinux.github.io/announcement/2017/04/29/hardenedlinux-statement2.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
I read that article. The whole "upstream/KSPP takes and gives nothing back" narrative is complete nonsense.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
grsecurity takes... the entire rest of the kernel from upstream. Guess what's more important, the grsec patch, or everything else?
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
The whole point of the GPLv2 is that we all benefit from everyone's work. grsecurity stopped sharing, so now we have to use what they left.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
speaking of GPL, they don't violate GPL. Those stable/test patches are still share with the customer who pay.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
They actually do violate the GPL, but not in that way (and those violations are upstream now). They distribute a GPLv2 plugin to GPLv3 code.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And the *reason* they did this was a hilarious (and wrong) licensing hack to try to stop RAP from being used for userspace code "for free".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.