It's GPL; schemes trying to restrict GPLed code via contract are inherently shady. Also the public RAP version violates GCC's license.
-
-
Sue them, then. I'm totally not interested in legal issues, only in cold hard technical facts (IANAL)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lazytyped @comex and
I can't sue them; I'm not a GCC copyright holder. Only the FSF can. I can complain, though, because I *am* a Linux copyright holder...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @lazytyped and
... and they upstreamed some similarly noncompliant GCC plugins into mainline Linux.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, not interested in this, sorry. And honestly I don't think you're a legal, so your opinion is just that, an opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lazytyped @comex and
I'm not a lawyer (a "legal"?) but I'm pretty sure I know more about the GPL than 99% of lawyers. Also, lawyers give *legal* opinions.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Okay, fantastic. I'll repeat, not interested. Take it up to Stallman or Linus, I'll keep enjoying the amazing technical work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lazytyped @comex and
"Amazing technical work" is no excuse to trample on the rights of others. Without respect for licenses we wouldn't have free software.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh God, I'm not claiming any moral high ground here. You're barking at the wrong tree here
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lazytyped @_pablosole_ and
at least now it is clear his complain is not based on anything technical...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @bsdaemon @lazytyped and
If you care to read the relevant threads, I have more than one complaint about how grsec runs things...
2:34 AM - 30 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.