It is in 4.8.17, and 4.7.10, and 4.6.5 (July last year), you're really up for complaining about whatever right?
-
-
Replying to @_pablosole_ @paxteam and
No it isn't. They announced this 3 months ago. https://grsecurity.net/rap_announce2.php … $ grep rap_ret_pass grsecurity-3.1-4.8.17-201701151620.patch $
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @_pablosole_ and
and note that even that announcement indicates that the commercial version has some secret stuff, just not as much as before.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah, so what's wrong in productizing good work?I don't understand your complaint here, it's their IP, they can do whatever with it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lazytyped @comex and
It's GPL; schemes trying to restrict GPLed code via contract are inherently shady. Also the public RAP version violates GCC's license.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sue them, then. I'm totally not interested in legal issues, only in cold hard technical facts (IANAL)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lazytyped @comex and
I can't sue them; I'm not a GCC copyright holder. Only the FSF can. I can complain, though, because I *am* a Linux copyright holder...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42 @lazytyped and
... and they upstreamed some similarly noncompliant GCC plugins into mainline Linux.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, not interested in this, sorry. And honestly I don't think you're a legal, so your opinion is just that, an opinion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lazytyped @comex and
I'm not a lawyer (a "legal"?) but I'm pretty sure I know more about the GPL than 99% of lawyers. Also, lawyers give *legal* opinions.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I.e. still opinions (though a very specific type of opinion with a very specific meaning and legal repercussions).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.