No, I didn't.
-
-
Replying to @justkelly_ok
How does that work then? I imagine companies should be judged by the totality of their hiring pool, not a single component.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @justkelly_ok
Because no component is unbiased, and some may be good indicators for other reasons. You can compensate/counter the bias.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marcan42
I literally think companies shouldn't spend any effort recruiting white men. White male candidates fall out of the sky.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @justkelly_ok
I doubt cos would hire from SO *with the intent of* hiring white men. Presumably it's a good indicator of something else.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marcan42
But they know that's who they're going to get though. Those companies rarely have conscious, explicit intent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @justkelly_ok @marcan42
I stand by my point that it means the company doesn't care about diversity.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @justkelly_ok
All I'm saying is I don't think the mere fact "partially hires from SO" automatically disqualifies a company from caring.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If you care to listen, I have a minor (multi-tweet) meta-rant to offer. Don't want to bug you if you don't though.
-
-
-
Replying to @justkelly_ok
Acknowledged. Too bad, I'd like to discuss this with someone sometime. Thanks anyway.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.