Tesla only implemented code-signed updates *now*? WTF? What is this, the 90s? https://www.wired.com/2016/09/tesla-responds-chinese-hack-major-security-upgrade/ …pic.twitter.com/QSzceZoGgB
-
I'm aware of that, obviously, but my point is that most attack vectors are going to be focusing on MitM'ing the OTA updates.
I disagree. Most attack vectors are going to be focusing on any random entry point, and without codesigning, you then push FW.
-
-
Either way it's irrelevant. I'm just saying that we're not likely to see mass bricking/pwning of Teslas via rogue femtocell.
-
Key bit is /mass/, if you're unfortunate enough to be a target OTOH...
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
right. as we saw in diesel tuning market a big push to reverse code and apply unsigned patches to enhance perf
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.