@marcan42 @xoreipeip @grsecurity ...reducing because you don't trust the code any more or because you're mad at the guy behind the code?
-
-
Replying to @_minipli
@marcan42@xoreipeip@grsecurity If the former you better take a second look. If the latter, just get over it. The code is worth it!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_minipli
@_minipli@xoreipeip@grsecurity Neither. Reducing because it doesn't meet the stability requirements I have (and grsec themselves agree!)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@marcan42@xoreipeip@grsecurity Fair enough... if stability is more important than security. Others may choose differently.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_minipli
@_minipli@xoreipeip@grsecurity Not others. I didn't say I was getting rid of grsecurity across the board, not by a long shot.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@_minipli@xoreipeip@grsecurity But yes, in one environment that I administer, I've concluded that it's really not worth it, objectively.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@_minipli@xoreipeip@grsecurity Basically limited-time, hands-on, high load, 4000 people hate me if it goes down for a minute.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@_minipli@xoreipeip@grsecurity And the fallout of a hypothetical breach would be relatively minute (no real sensitive data).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@_minipli@xoreipeip@grsecurity Plus we already compartmentalize using VMs anyway. I'm leaving grsec on one VM (CTF contest host :P)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@_minipli@xoreipeip@grsecurity Basically the most sensitive data we store is... the plaintext passwords of 15 admins or so (don't ask)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@_minipli @xoreipeip @grsecurity And if they're reusing passwords they should really know better :P
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.