@marcan42 @pmarreck @grsecurity to see how great security is in a memory safe, strongly typed and even fully verifiable lang, look at Java.
-
-
Replying to @marver
@marver@pmarreck@grsecurity IIRC Java isn't even concurrency-safe, while Rust is. :)1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@marcan42@marver@pmarreck@grsecurity will rust automatically make sure you get locking in a kernel right?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @marver2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
-
Replying to @marcan421 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @marcan42
@marcan42@pmarreck yes that and other flaws in logic leading to privesc. To quote@cynicalsecurity: "There will always be a Belgium"1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marver
@marver@pmarreck@cynicalsecurity Of course. It's no magic bullet, but it's still an interesting idea.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marcan42
@marcan42@pmarreck@cynicalsecurity Yes I favour the idea of writing drivers in$notc. just the "get rid of C and solve security" is wrong.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cynicalsecurity
@cynicalsecurity@marver@pmarreck No language stops bad code, but there is value in langs that make mistakes less likely.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
@cynicalsecurity @marver @pmarreck "Get rid of C" is dumb, but writing more critical code in a safer lang would in practice help.
-
-
Replying to @marcan42
@cynicalsecurity@marver@pmarreck And I say this as someone who likes C a lot. Still find the idea of Rust interesting. We'll see.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.