I mean the security features are nice and all, but false positives and careless patches do not make a stable kernel. @grsecurity
Starting to think that the @grsecurity kernel is not suitable for prod. First SIZE_OVERFLOW false +s, now panic due to a bug they introduced
-
-
-
I literally crashed my box by pasting a bunch of text into a terminal, due to a really sad bug in the patch (no code review?).
@grsecurity - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@visiblecode
@munin@grsecurity At least their own hardening caught their own bug. Irony. Too bad it's still a DoS.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@marcan42@grsecurity SIZE_OVERFLOW has false positives by design due to GCC limitations. Shouldn't enable if DoS is more important to you. -
@marcan42@grsecurity And in addition to that, it catches both intended and benign unintended overflows. So it can be painful to use it. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.