@0xdeadbabe but... why? Why choose an inferior chip just because its x86? Recompiling is easy, choose the best tool for the job.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @0xdeadbabe
@0xdeadbabe I would actually argue that knowledge of bring up on ARM is more extensive. x86 early boot stuff is *arcane*.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @0xdeadbabe
@0xdeadbabe Yeah, and most ARM boards have a ready to go u-boot and Linux serving the same purpose ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @0xdeadbabe
@0xdeadbabe There's plenty of microframeworks/RTOSes for smaller-spec ARM devices - which isn't even a market for x86.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @0xdeadbabe
@0xdeadbabe Sure, and you can't really run Linux on a quark with internal RAM only either. Are there any non-linux frameworks for Quark?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @0xdeadbabe
@0xdeadbabe The Quark SoC X1000 has 512K of embedded RAM. A lot by microcontroller standards, but not enough for Linux.
8:47 PM - 26 Oct 2014
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.