you'd think supposedly-logical people would agree that if 98% of Y are caused by X and the prior of X is 50%, then X is likely a factor in Y
-
-
Replying to @FioraAeterna
@FioraAeterna X is likely an indirect factor in Y, but that doesn't mean Y is directly caused by X or that the way to fix Y is to fix X.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna
@FioraAeterna Sure, but there's reasonable ways of talking about X wrt Y, and then there's inflammatory troll/clickbait.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
@FioraAeterna The ongoing flamewar is less about X vs. Z and more about people on both sides abandoning all pretense of reasonable dialogue.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FioraAeterna
@FioraAeterna Also, Twitter is a fucking *terrible* medium for discussing any of this. Its brevity incites extreme sweeping statements.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @FioraAeterna
@FioraAeterna Nope, only the link-less tweet made it to my timeline. Case in point for why Twitter sucks for this.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@FioraAeterna FWIW, having read the article, I think it's reasonable (but not very scientific). I disagree with some of it. Which is OK.
-
-
Replying to @marcan42
@FioraAeterna OTOH, the way it was condensed into multiple disconnected tweets was, IMO, inflammatory.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.