So here is an interesting copyright question to ponder: are we allowed to redistribute binaries of open source software that have been compiled and signed by Apple?
-
-
Effectively: does merely compiling (without making any changes vs. published, freely-licensed open source code) an application create a derivative work? My understanding is no, because there is no originality involved in the process, it is purely mechanical.
Show this thread -
But this will be an interesting one to ask the lawyers, if we find that doing things this way would let us enable new ways of installing Linux.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Alternative question, is there any explicitly allowed for distribution signed binaries that Apple provide on their website? e.g. Mac updates, Xcode devtools, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hiya. Please give this another try on the latest 11.2 beta. Apple Silicon was supposed to match Intel’s Recovery mode: after authenticating, any binary should run. We regret the error. :)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.