Messaging apps organized around private chats with basic group chats as an afterthought like Telegram, Signal, LINE, Hangouts, etc are right out.
-
Show this thread
-
Matrix seems to be intended to be this federated utopia, with all the complexity and moderation headaches that entails. There are bridges to other platforms, which like all bridges, randomly break and are inconvenient.
4 replies 0 retweets 20 likesShow this thread -
Mattermost and Rocket Chat are just Slack clones mostly intended for businesses to self-host or pay for cloud subs. I've used both. I'm not very impressed.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
I'm trying Zulip and it's... overcomplicated? I can see how topics make sense in certain larger communities with lots of task management (like Rust), but not really for a project like Asahi Linux. And then there's the bad first impression their approach to auth gave me already.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likesShow this thread -
Plus most of these haven't reached critical mass / appeal, except Discord and Slack (out for the aforementioned reasons)... and IRC.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
And so I'm left with the idea of just having a freenode channel, with
@whitequark's logging bot in it, letting people bridge in via the Matrix bridge at least until that becomes a problem, and calling it a day...3 replies 0 retweets 22 likesShow this thread -
Yes, it's terrible, it's plain text only, it has no sane file transfer, it has no log integration, it's not particularly newbie-friendly... but nothing else seems to be strictly better in enough ways. And at least I already know how it works and so do most FOSS devs.
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likesShow this thread -
I haven't made my decision yet, feel free to try to change my mind.
17 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @marcan42
Mattermost is pretty configurable, and you can setup IRC bridges to it if you want. I tried many groupchat systems, and I'd say stick to Mattermost if it suits for your needs. Although I don't understand why would you want to use a chat system in the first place. Forum, maybe?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Forum software is even more stagnant tbh
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If you don't understand why I would want to use a chat system, you've never worked on reverse engineering. I don't know a single reverse engineering team that *doesn't* use a chat system as their primary form of communication.
-
-
Sure I did, and I had to use chats, and I know that many RE teams (and many other) primarily use chats, but I don't think it's a perfect management/communication tool. I always end up using local wiki/Cherrytree/email/forum. Using chat groups with pinned mesgs etc is a ugly hack
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Mind telling what functions do you need from the chat, and how do you use it? I mean, you even ready to struggle with IRC (w/bouncers I hope) and logging bot, but you still prefer chat and not other tool.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.