To clarify, since I've seen some confused people: Glasgow is an open hardware project started by @whitequark and run by volunteers, and @1bitsquared is our first volume manufacturer offering it to the public. @esden put a *ton* of work into productionizing it.
Glasgow is dual licensed under 0BSD and Apache-2.0 as a whole; I don't think we have a specific separate license for the hardware design (maybe we should?)
-
-
All the 1BitSquared changes are being upstreamed; AIUI the only difference between what you'll get from CrowdSupply and what's in upstream GitHub is the 1BitSquared logo (which is a dummy placeholder instead).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like CERN-OHL licenses because they are specifically tailored for HW. Depending on what terms you want people to do (or don't) with the design, 0BSD and Apache might be OK. The problem is when you use GPL and similar licenses, that do not apply very well to HW designs.
-
I think BSD like licenses that are more like "do whatever you want with this as long as you give me credit" apply OK to hardware too.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.