Why is it that half the time I read a HN article about some cool research in a field I'm familiar with, I go "huh, that sounds impossible, I wonder how they're doing that"... then it turns out they aren't and the entire thing will never work in practical applications.
-
Show this thread
-
The latest one is a remote noise cancelation system where, after pages and pages about the approach, it ends with "oh yeah we're using the original noise signal, as played via speakers, as an input into the noise canceling algorithm, we know real ANC systems don't do that"
2 replies 0 retweets 45 likesShow this thread -
Why yes, when you collapse an entire sound field to 2-4 sources you have perfectly characterized, noise cancellation becomes very easy doesn't it?
2 replies 1 retweet 52 likesShow this thread -
HN commenter "but they only focused on one component of the solution, that's valid". Why yes, yes it is valid. It's just that the missing component is time travel.
5 replies 4 retweets 66 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @marcan42
Yes, but using their solution couldn't you cancel out ahead-of-time known sources of sound? I.e a room has radio playing and in another room you use the same signal to make that other room quiet.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Yes... which is a far cry from what people normally think of when they think noise cancellation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.