The latest one is a remote noise cancelation system where, after pages and pages about the approach, it ends with "oh yeah we're using the original noise signal, as played via speakers, as an input into the noise canceling algorithm, we know real ANC systems don't do that"
-
-
Show this thread
-
Why yes, when you collapse an entire sound field to 2-4 sources you have perfectly characterized, noise cancellation becomes very easy doesn't it?
Show this thread -
HN commenter "but they only focused on one component of the solution, that's valid". Why yes, yes it is valid. It's just that the missing component is time travel.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the real question is, why are you reading HN articles?
-
I really need to find myself a better pastime for waiting for something with only my phone situations. Any suggestions?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
classical HN tbh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like academic research... xD
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because researchers gets attention and $. Ever see a multi GHz CPU with 30x power efficiency and incredible IPC? The catch is it runs entirely off SRAM.
-
Damn you, Big Research! *shakes fist*
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's my reaction with a lot of your project writeups except they are possible and I just have limited knowledge of the subjects
.
That's why it's fun tho.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.