I'm trying to get rid of all remaining instances of "slave" in the fwupd codebase. The advice is primary and secondary, but for i2c that's just not accurate as it is the master _telling_ the slave what to do, rather than the slave being a fallback. Other ideas welcome too!
-
-
Replying to @hughsient
We went with initiator/target for Glasgow. This makes perfect sense, because the "initiator" starts the transaction and the "target" is the addressee of the transaction. Even the I²C spec defines the "master" as "initiating" the transaction.https://github.com/GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow/commit/5a53dc1649a238cbf6d2f21ba599635579387f89 …
4 replies 0 retweets 34 likes -
Replying to @marcan42
I used this tweet in the commit message for https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/pull/2244 … -- I hope that's okay! :)
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
Replying to @hughsient
Of course, no problem! (sorry, just noticed this reply now) :)
10:18 AM - 5 Jul 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.