PSA: we've got a couple projects switching from I²C "master/slave" to "initiator/target" already, so if you're looking for more accurate and descriptive nomenclature, consider these :) https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/pull/2244 … https://github.com/GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow/commit/5a53dc1649a238cbf6d2f21ba599635579387f89 …
I think you may be associating too much meaning to protocol design features :-)
-
-
..and yet we're arguing that the names we use in these protocols are a mirror of society. Some protocols are anti-social, and that includes clock stretching

-
Nah, I'm arguing that the names we use in these protocols are just bad and don't accurately represent the protocol roles :-)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.