PSA: we've got a couple projects switching from I²C "master/slave" to "initiator/target" already, so if you're looking for more accurate and descriptive nomenclature, consider these :) https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/pull/2244 … https://github.com/GlasgowEmbedded/glasgow/commit/5a53dc1649a238cbf6d2f21ba599635579387f89 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @marcan42
This was solved in the 1990s. It was called 'main' and 'secondary'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scott_Holmes
I've never seen those terms used in the context of I²C, do you have a reference? I think initiator/target better describe the bus communication roles, though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Scott_Holmes
But SPI and I²C are very different communication buses with very different device roles. That they're both called "master" and "slave" is testament to just how bad that terminology is and how people lazily use it in situations where it doesn't really apply.
9:32 PM - 1 Jul 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.