I'm trying to get rid of all remaining instances of "slave" in the fwupd codebase. The advice is primary and secondary, but for i2c that's just not accurate as it is the master _telling_ the slave what to do, rather than the slave being a fallback. Other ideas welcome too!
-
I'm torn between initiator/responder and initiator/target -- erring on the former at the moment as target sounds like the ID rather than the device itself.
Both are good TBH, looping in @whitequark here. I'd rather we agree on one alternative and all stick to it, I wouldn't mind replacing the latter in Glasgow at this point to harmonize.
-
-
Excellent. I can switch all the ColorHug stuff to the new names too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm going to stick with initiator/target since there's precedent for that, I think
-
Then we all agree, thanks! fwupd is fixed now.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.