Like, look, if after all this you still buy Intel for any security application, that's basically negligence at this point. They clearly don't have the slightest clue what they're doing. They don't care. They have no formal security boundaries. It's held together by masking tape.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What paper are you looking at? Want to know more about the topic. Good morning btw
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I mean this in all sincerity - why is this a problem?
-
Because now you're broadcasting extremely sensitive data (as in: all your private keys are belong to us) intended for one core to all cores. That breaks down the core isolation boundary, making the security as weak as hyperthread isolation. And we know that one is really weak.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
These are also the people who made rdrand/rdseed virtualizable...
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. I can understand sharing CPUID, but putting cryptographically sensitive random data in the same buffer? Why?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sorry, what did you say about Intel and bounds?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.