Because what he's doing hurts people, and his opinions are actively harmful towards minorities in STEM. That's like saying "let Trump be, he just has opinions". Opinions make a difference.
-
Also - i didn’t say women aren’t good enough or they don’t matter. They happen to be more interested in other topics
I think it’s discriminating to over represent any part of society - because what is it worth to be in tech if everyone knows you are here for the quotas?
Again, Dave *specifically* mentioned two of the most well respected women in EE tech and said they only got front page covers because they're women. Thus saying, to the world, "I think these women are not good enough".
-
-
Which tells other women "no matter how good you are, we will always treat you as an inferior person who only got as far as you did because of your gender".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, it did certainly help to be female
In Germany they demand a quote for females in boards of corporations. Every woman I know that is hard working, as everyone has to do to accomplish anything, is against it. Because it undermines every effort they put in their career. -
Again, he is *literally pointing fingers at specific woman and undermining them*. You can argue against quotas. What you can't do is literally point fingers and say "you're there because of the quota".
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.