it definitely depends on the task at hand, but that also supports the idea that people shouldn't judge the software because it might be slow for a certain use case.
There's this perception that Ghidra is slow but... I just analyzed a Linux kernel in ~15 minutes with Ghidra and ~20 minutes with IDA. 
I did close all toolbars during analysis in both cases, which I've heard Ghidra particularly struggles with (but I think it affects IDA too).
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There’s also Relyze for x86/arm, which is free for home use, and Binary Ninja, which is much more affordable than IDA Both come with decompiler
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yep, can confirm tried loading a PS3 game with debugging symbols (300mb) and it took 3d and crashed at the end. closed all the windows, it was done in 3.5h fully analyzed, no crash
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ghidra 9.2 also addressed a lot of these UI-related performance issues, but unfortunately you still have to build it manually. Seehttps://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra/issues/500 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.